One Size Does Not Fit All: Conceptualizing Alternative Data Approaches to Improve Single-Language Developmental Language Disorder Screening for Multilingual Public School Students
- Erica Gutmann,
- Crystle N. Alonzo(corresponding author),
- Ashley Sanabria,
- Katharine M. Radville,
- ,
- Jessie Ricketts
- San Diego State University,
- Northeastern University,
- ,
- Royal Holloway, University of London,
- MGH Institute of Health Professions
Abstract
Purpose: Universal screening for developmental language disorder (DLD) is a promising preventative approach for decreasing negative educational outcomes associated with DLD. Unfortunately, schools with multilingual student popula-tions often face barriers in following best-practice guidelines for language test-ing and screening students in all their languages. We explored the outcome of a school district administering a single-language DLD screener to a multilingual stu-dent body, as well as alternative approaches for using single-language screening data to identify DLD risk in multilingual students. Method: A school district engaged in a research–practice partnership adminis-tered an English-only DLD screener to 703 kindergartners with English language learner (ELL) status. We analyzed screener outcomes and the relationship of identi-fied DLD risk status and English proficiency level for the ELLs. We explored alterna-tive data analysis approaches of local norms, adjusted cut-points, change in screener score from fall to spring, and a hybrid of adjusted cut-points and change to determine which approaches identified DLD risk status for ELLs at a rate more aligned with DLD prevalence rates and the intended rates of a screener. Results: The English-only language screener overidentified multilingual students as at risk for DLD. There was a significant negative correlation between risk identification and student English proficiency level. All alternative methods for data analysis lowered the rate of identification of ELLs as at risk for DLD. Conclusions: Single-language testing overidentifies multilingual students as at risk for DLD. We caution school districts against a monolingual screening approach to screen multilingual students and encourage them to consider alternative approaches to using English-only screening data for multilingual students.
Bibliographic Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 693-709 (17 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools (Volume 57, Issue 3)Publication milestones
- Published - 07/2026
Publication status
ISSN
0161-1461Publication IDs
- Scopus: 105044621589
- PubMed: 41894315
