Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The new sovereigntist challenge for global governance: Democracy without sovereignty

*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
1
Captures
77
Citations
31

Abstract

The "new sovereigntists," a prominent group of scholars and policymakers, articulate a widely held view that global governance is inherently undemocratic because it undermines popular sovereignty. Problems with their argument notwithstanding, we argue that they identify a real and serious tension. We also argue, however, that the vision of democracy as popular sovereignty that they advocate is becoming incoherent and untenable in an era of increasing interdependence. Conceptions of democracy anchored in popular sovereignty depend for their legitimacy on empirical conditions that no longer obtain. What we call the new sovereigntist challenge for global governance is to develop an alternate conception of democracy that avoids the logic and forms of popular sovereignty at the global level while still respecting and promoting democracy and democratization within states. We outline one such alternative here.

Bibliographic Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1047-1068 (22 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Studies Quarterly (Volume 55, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2011

Publication status

Published - 12/2011

ISSN

0020-8833

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80755143392