Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

St. Augustine's appropriation and transformation of Aristotelian eudaimonia

*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Chapter

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
17
Captures
37

Abstract

Introduction: The earliest known Latin version of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics was produced from the Greek by an anonymous translator in the twelfth century. This version, however, was incomplete and it was not until about 1246 that a complete version was translated by Robert Grosseteste. By 1260, the revised version of William of Moerbeke was available and circulated widely over the following decades. Thus, Aristotle's text became known to Latin readers piecemeal over the span of a generation and did not begin to have a serious impact on moral philosophy in the Latin West until the second half of the thirteenth century. Once the naturalistic account of virtue contained in the Nicomachean Ethics became known, it significantly changed the philosophical landscape. Prior to the recovery of Aristotle's text, Latin thinkers showed little interest in naturalistic accounts of moral goodness, focusing instead on the necessity of divine assistance for the morally good life. This theological orientation was generally attributed to the influence of Augustine in the medieval monastic schools. It was not until the revival of Aristotelian naturalism by Albertus Magnus that the Nicomachean Ethics began to exert a philosophical influence in the medieval universities. The reception of Aristotle's moral philosophy in the thirteenth century, then, marks a watershed in the history of Western ethics. Yet, this development raises the question of the extent to which Augustine's approach to moral philosophy was influenced by or departed from the naturalistic account of human happiness found in the Nicomachean Ethics. If the theological ethics of the medieval monastic schools was dominated by an Augustinian approach, then determining Augustine's place in the history of the reception of Aristotle's text is crucial. Moreover, it has been recently argued that Aristotle's account of virtue and eudaimonia was available in the twelfth century from sources other than the text of the Nicomachean Ethics itself, notably Aristotle's logical works and Cicero's De inventione. As some of these works were available to Augustine in the fourth century, the Augustinian synthesis of the early medieval schools may have already incorporated elements of Aristotle's ethics.

Bibliographic Information

Output type

Research Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Chapter

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 67-84 (18 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2009

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2009

Publisher

Cambridge University Press
9780521513883

ISBN (Electronic)

9780511979873

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84929287955

Host publication title

The Reception of Aristotle's Ethics