Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Prefatory meditations

*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Chapter
Research

Publication metrics

PlumX

Citation count
2
Captures
1

Abstract

This essay purports to show that Merleau-Ponty's philosophical career was marked from its very beginning by doubt about the vocation of the phenomenologist to offer a description of lived experience that would reveal the coming into being of meaning before the objectifications and interpretations of natural science or the natural attitude. Like Schelling, Merleau-Ponty turns to the artist, to the painter, who, according to Merleau-Ponty, alone accomplishes the phenomenologist's epoché, who alone catches in her or his colors the opening of sensibility itself into the sensing and the sensed, the very coming to be of phenomenality itself, the epiphany of things. In trying to model his thinking after that which hefinds in painting, Merleau-Ponty runs up against the historicity of philosophical language, even the highly reformed language he proposes in his last works, a language that violates this epiphany of being.

Bibliographic Information

Output type

Research Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Chapter
Research

Host publication Subtitle

Merleau-Ponty, Schelling, and the Question of Nature

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 23-37 (15 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2013

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2013

Publisher

State University of New York Press
9781438448473

ISBN (Electronic)

9781438448480

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84941796795

Host publication title

The Barbarian Principle