Performance reviews as an active method to improve feedback and performance

This paper responds to calls from teacher-student feedback research looking for options on how to improve student performance. In Study 1, we first observe the relationship between student conscientiousness, midterm-performance, feedback-seeking behaviors, and final semester grades. Second, in Study 2, we test whether using an active learning method helps students improve grades regardless of their individual differences. Specifically, we test how the implementation of a face-to-face instructor-student performance review at midterm can be beneficial for performance improvement by allowing students who would otherwise not seek additional feedback or clarity to discuss performance completely. Structural equation modeling and mean difference tests are used to test empirical relationships between personality, behavior, and performance. Comparisons between groups that did and did not include a midterm review supports the hypothesis that interactive mid-term performance reviews improve class grades. Regression analysis supports that performance reviews improve grades even after controlling for individual differences. This active learning technique has both immediate and long-term benefits. In addition to grade improvement, mid-term reviews allow students to experience how to conduct professional performance reviews and receive and use feedback more effectively. The discussion offers simple advice on how midterm reviews can occur even within remote classes.