Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Do US pharmaceutical companies strategically shift income to international affiliates?

  • ,
  • bUniversity of Southern Indiana
    ,
  • cNorth Dakota State University
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to empirically identify incentives that drive resource shifting by US pharmaceutical firms to comparatively low-tax jurisdictions. Design/methodology/approach: Using a panel of publicly listed companies, we investigate whether resource shifting is facilitated by two underlying factors. First, we examine whether pharmaceutical manufacturers whose intangible assets are disproportionately held as intellectual property are more or less likely to shift resources to jurisdictions outside of the USA. Second, we empirically determine whether manufacturers that derive most of their revenues from producing a specific type of product are more or less likely to shift income-producing resources to their international affiliates. Findings: The empirical results suggest that pharmaceutical factors do practice strategic resource shifting. Moreover, pharmaceutical manufacturers which produce biologic medications are significantly less likely than other manufacturers to practice resource shifting. We find no evidence to suggest that firms whose intangible assets are more composed of intellectual property are any more or less likely to practice resource shifting. Originality/value: To date, a plethora of studies exist which examine resource shifting in a large, general population of multinational corporations. However, there are relatively few studies that examine international resource shifting in the pharmaceutical industry.

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals