Justice “cost points”: Examination of privatization within public systems of justice
- Alexes Harris,
- ,
- Emmi Obara
- University of Washington
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewAbstract
Research Summary
In addition to outsourcing the management of correctional facilities, many local and state authorities contract with private companies to provide a variety of services and processes within U.S. courthouses, jails, and prisons. In this article, we explore the various “cost points” at which individuals who make contact with public systems of justice are charged by private entities. We provide two case studies with an in-depth look at how private companies make money within U.S. justice facilities—court-ordered programs and prison services.
Policy Implications
Through our examples, we show the extent to which private companies generate profits within U.S. systems of justice and the potential impacts of justice “cost points” on those involved in these systems. We end by suggesting policy makers more thoroughly explore the reasons for the privatization of justice system practices and services and develop transparent oversight to ensure private arrangements do not impose undue burdens on justice-involved individuals and their families.
In addition to outsourcing the management of correctional facilities, many local and state authorities contract with private companies to provide a variety of services and processes within U.S. courthouses, jails, and prisons. In this article, we explore the various “cost points” at which individuals who make contact with public systems of justice are charged by private entities. We provide two case studies with an in-depth look at how private companies make money within U.S. justice facilities—court-ordered programs and prison services.
Policy Implications
Through our examples, we show the extent to which private companies generate profits within U.S. systems of justice and the potential impacts of justice “cost points” on those involved in these systems. We end by suggesting policy makers more thoroughly explore the reasons for the privatization of justice system practices and services and develop transparent oversight to ensure private arrangements do not impose undue burdens on justice-involved individuals and their families.
Access to documents
Bibliographic Information
Output type
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
American EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 343-359Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Criminology & Public Policy (Volume 18, Issue 2)Publication milestones
- Published - 05/2019
Publication status
Published - 05/2019
ISSN
1538-6473Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85065697942
