Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

In defense of fortin

*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
3
Captures
5

Abstract

The problem addressed by Professor Tierney is also a problem on which Professor Ernest Fortin, a member of this journal's editorial advisory board, has written extensively and forcefully. Unfortunately, the lingering effects of an untimely stroke make it impossible for him to respond to Tierney's essay. The editor of the Review of Politics has consequently asked me to respond in his stead. My goal is to be faithful to Fortin's position, but of course the following remarks must be taken as my own. It would be contrary to Fr. Fortin's generous spirit for me not to note at the outset that he is genuinely impressed with Tierney's tireless research on the question of the origin of modern natural rights theories, even if he does not always agree with Tierney's assessment of the matter.

Bibliographic Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 411-413 (3 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Review of Politics (Volume 64, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2002

Publication status

Published - 2002

ISSN

0034-6705

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 43249204076