Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Ethical responsibilities to subjects and documentary filmmaking

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
69
Citations
16

Abstract

Documentary filmmakers have ethical responsibilities to the subjects of their films. Specifically, they have an ethical responsibility to prevent harm to their subjects if they are in a position to do so, even harm not directly related to being in the film. Justification for this comes from documentary's status as a practice of a social institution and can be supported by Utilitarian and Kantian considerations, as well as the Aristotelian discussion of practices. Three films, The Thin Blue Line, Dope Sick Love, and Born Into Brothels, are used as examples for the requirement to prevent harm to subjects. These examples cover several different possibilities of how documentary filmmakers behave concerning the welfare of their subjects and are evaluated in light of ethical considerations offered.

Bibliographic Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 192-206 (15 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality (Volume 25, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2010

Publication status

Published - 07/2010

ISSN

0890-0523

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 79959654837